A lot of disagreements exist on the contribution of nature and nurture on the intelligence of an individual. Several theories also exist concerning intelligence. Common evidences of genetic influence include the studies on twins and adoptions. For the environment factor: school attendance has impacts on IQ and twins reared on a different environment have less likely similar to twins raised together.
Personally, I believe that both genetic factors and environment contribute to the variation in intelligence. Intelligence is present at birth and can be altered by the environment. Genetic factors and environment truly complement each other in affecting the overall intelligence of the individual.
I learn best by solving problems and doing things myself. I usually don’t jell with others when working in a team since I prefer to work on a task individually and then asking inputs later after finishing it. I like lists, diagrams and illustrations when learning too. I believe that there is always a methodical and optimal way to solve a problem. I analyze a problem and often apply Mathematics and logic in solving everyday problems. I believe that both genetics and environment somehow shaped the intelligences present in me. None of my parents are musically inclined like my other siblings, which is also true for me. Environment, primarily my attendance in schools also shaped my intelligences. Taking up an Engineering degree perhaps nurtured my visual, logical and intrapersonal intelligences.
Notion of intelligence affect the way we teach. For example, when we perceive that our students are intelligent we tend to be more challenged and motivated to study and prepare on a certain topic. On the contrary, if we perceive it the other way around, we adjust the level of difficulty of the activities, exercises and tests we are giving sometimes leading to mediocrity on our part as teachers as well. On learning, if we know we are good at a certain task, we are inclined to pursue it. For example, when we know we are good in Logic/Math we can confidently take engineering, if we possess excellent interpersonal skills, we can take teaching or sales. Ideally, we should treat all students fairly since they are all capable of learning and their capabilities and interests are diverse taking into consideration, the Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Students may have weak points on certain areas but have strong points in other fields. Varied teaching approaches should cater to these individual differences.
In terms of education we tend to correlate the academic success of parents to their children’s achievement. When the parents are doctors, the society and even the education system expects that one child will also become a doctor. This belief is an evidence that notion of intelligence and expectations of the society play vital roles in the lives of people.
Our educational curriculum somehow supports multiple intelligences. The subjects in the primary and secondary level such as Social studies, Language (English and Filipino), Music, Arts, P.E., Mathematics and other subjects are part of the intelligences described by Gardner. At the classroom setting however, we seldom experience environment that supports multiple intelligences. We often tie intelligence to numerical, logical ability and language proficiency and neglect other areas such as emotional intelligence.
The drawback of a standardized test on intelligence is that the tests do not depict the overall intelligence of the person. It mainly measures the analytical skills of an individual and failed to consider other fields (i.e., existential, kinesthetic, musical, emotional, etc.) of intelligence. One thing more, these tests are validity and reliability tested in foreign lands and that these may not be applicable in other cultures, hence bias is present. We must also measure both aptitude and achievement in entrance examinations and job qualifications. In looking for the right person for a specific job, Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory can be used, wherein the analytic, practical and creative intelligence of the applicant should be measured.
I took the test on Multiple Intelligences from the site, http://www.bgfl.org/bgfl/custom/resources_ftp/client_ftp/ks3/ict/multiple_int/index.htm which was posted by one of my classmates in EDS 103, Mr. Batu Yilmaz and the graphical result is shown in the figure below. I agree with the results since it is parallel to the result of the test I have taken in Learning Styles in my previous e-Journal Entry. Being aware of my intelligences in the areas of logical, visual and intrapersonal can help me learn effectively too. I can use these strategies for me to learn and take capitalize on these areas.
Knowing the nature of intelligence broadens my teaching practices. Rather than focusing on general mental ability and learning of facts, I will teachers encourage acquisition of cognitive skills and problem-solving ability among my students. Since intelligence is not measured only on mental ability, we should shift from the traditional approach of teaching, wherein memorization of facts is a common practice, to facilitating and teaching the students learning skills. We must accept the idea that students excel in varying areas and fields. Our role as teachers is to provide opportunities for their intelligences to developed and positively used for the betterment of the individual and the society.
Let me redefine intelligence as hinged on the different theories and satisfy other views concerning it:
“Intelligence is the cognitive, social, emotional and physical faculty of an individual essential in the adaptation to the constantly changing environment.”